Promotion

Our New Book: From Law School to Lawyer: True Stories of Drop Outs, Career Disappointment and Regret is available for FREE on Amazon from April 21st until April 25th, 2015.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Hawkins v. McGee case brief

Hawkins v. McGee; Hairy Hand case; (Sup. Ct. of NH, 1929); Supp 10; Notes 2
  • Facts: Hawkins’ hand had scar on it. Doctor convinces him to let him do skin-graft (doc wanted practice in it). Doc said Hawkins would be in hospital no more than 4 days, and promised him a “100% good hand.” No written contract – Hawkins’ dad to pay sometime (undisclosed sum, indeterminate time). After surgery, Hawkins hand is mangled and hairy.
  • Cause of Action: Breach of warranty in that hand was not rendered 100% useful.
  • Holding: Doc breached warranty re: guarantee of perfect hand. Not only was Hawkins’ hand not made perfect, but it was made worse. The extended hospital stay was not a warranty and thus not a breach.
  • Rule: expectation remedy: put Hawkins where he would have been had the promise been fulfilled.
  • Damages: (value of Hawkins would have received if contract carried out) – (value of current hand) + (incidental losses resulting from breach)
  • Rationale: Court analogies to case of machine w/ warranty. If warranty broken, P would get value of working machine minus value it actually has, plus incidental. Also says that pain and suffering should not be taken into account b/c Hawkins was willing to endure this p&s had surgery been successful.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Search Thousands of Case Briefs and Articles.