Friday, March 23, 2012

Colonial Dodge, Inc v. Miller case brief

Colonial Dodge, Inc v. Miller; (Ct of Appeals of Michigan, 1982); CB 122; Notes 19
  • Facts: D purchased car from P. D thought truck included 5 tires, when he got home realized only 4 (tire shortage). D stopped payment and told P to come get car. P didn’t, towed by city. P sued for purchase price of car, claiming D accepted.
  • Holding: can get money back b/c there was no opportunity to inspect the car, per § 2-608(1)(a), notwithstanding fact that buyer accepted car and drove it home. For amount that buyer already paid, he turns to § 2-711 to recover price.
  • Rule: This is a rescission approach. Court saying there is essentially no K, under the perfect tender rule, b/c unless goods presented (tendered) are exactly as promised, the purchaser has the right to reject the whole.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Ins and Outs of Class Action Lawsuits: A Comprehensive Guide

Sometimes, you may buy a product only to find it defective. To make it worse, your search for the product reveals mass complaints. You can ...