Sunday, March 25, 2012

Buck v. Bell case brief

Buck v. Bell (1927) The Right to Procreate
Holmes upheld a VA statute that established a process for the sterilization of mentally retarded persons in state institutions. Statute based on assumptions that developmental disability is inheritable. Buck argued that the statute intruded her bodily integrity in violation of DP and since it only applied to those people who were institutionalized, it violated EP. Homes said there was a state interest in promoting the public welfare to justify the statute against substantive DP attack.

Note: The SC later held that the right to procreate is a fundamental right ( so gov’t imposed sterilization must meet strict scrutiny)

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads

https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...