FACTS
-Personal Injury action involving blind man who walked off elevated walkway.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
-P found contributory negligent
ISSUE
-Is a blind man contributory negligent in injuries sustained in an accident in which he fell off a walkway?
HOLDING
-He was contributory negligent due to not using a seeing eye dog or a cane.
RULES
-A blind man must exercise due care in using public walkways commensurate with the known or reasonably foreseeable dangers.
-Due care is such care as an ordinary prudent person with the same disability would exercise under the same or similar circumstances.
The best place for complete law school case briefs and law-related news. Want to advertise or post sponsored content? contact us at mrmetropolitan@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 Benefits of Studying Criminal Justice
Image Source Have you ever considered a career where each day offers a new challenge and the chance to make a real difference? Studying cr...

-
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...
No comments:
Post a Comment