FACTS
-SABA was allowed to use their distribution system, Metro had provided adverse material to the Commission regarding SABA, as SABA would not let Metro partake in the system.
-Metro challenged the favorable decision that was granted to SABA.
Issue: The contested decision was not addressed to Metro. Was it a direct and individual concern to Metro?
Holding: The court said yes. Metro was directly and individually concerned.
-SABA was allowed to use their distribution system, Metro had provided adverse material to the Commission regarding SABA, as SABA would not let Metro partake in the system.
-Metro challenged the favorable decision that was granted to SABA.
Issue: The contested decision was not addressed to Metro. Was it a direct and individual concern to Metro?
Holding: The court said yes. Metro was directly and individually concerned.
No comments:
Post a Comment