Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Rael v. F & S Co. (pain and suffering)

Rael v. F & S Co.
Subject: Pain and suffering.

FACTS

The child plaintiff in this case was injured by a firework and sued for pain and suffering.

RULES

Two Pronged Approach for Pain and Suffering
1. Objective Injury - if plainly apparent, from the very nature, that the injured person will go through pain and suffering in the future, Pl. not required to prove the evident fact.
2. Subjective Injury - laymen cannot, with reasonable certainty, know whether or not there will be future pain and suffering, and to authorize a jury to return a verdict with instruction therefore, evidence must be offered by an expert witness.

APPLICATION

-Subjective in this case: headaches in back of head. Cannot be deemed a matter of common knowledge. Jury should not have been instructed that it could award pain and suffering.

CONCURRENCE
Not even the most experienced and learned physician can find a way or method of measuring pain and suffering.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Ins and Outs of Class Action Lawsuits: A Comprehensive Guide

Sometimes, you may buy a product only to find it defective. To make it worse, your search for the product reveals mass complaints. You can ...