Rael v. F & S Co.
Subject: Pain and suffering.
FACTS
The child plaintiff in this case was injured by a firework and sued for pain and suffering.
RULES
Two Pronged Approach for Pain and Suffering
1. Objective Injury - if plainly apparent, from the very nature, that the injured person will go through pain and suffering in the future, Pl. not required to prove the evident fact.
2. Subjective Injury - laymen cannot, with reasonable certainty, know whether or not there will be future pain and suffering, and to authorize a jury to return a verdict with instruction therefore, evidence must be offered by an expert witness.
APPLICATION
-Subjective in this case: headaches in back of head. Cannot be deemed a matter of common knowledge. Jury should not have been instructed that it could award pain and suffering.
CONCURRENCE
Not even the most experienced and learned physician can find a way or method of measuring pain and suffering.
Case briefs for law students, lawyers, and others researching case law. I created many of these briefs in law school and periodically update them from time to time. My goal has been to build a one stop resource center for law students!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Full Outline of The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest
The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest is a transformative self-help book that delves into self-sabo...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...
-
Case Brief: Brisboy v. Fireboard Paper Products Corporation Court: Michigan Supreme Court Citation: 429 Mich. 540, 418 N.W.2d 650 (1988) D...
No comments:
Post a Comment