Armory v. Delamirie Case Brief: The Legal Rights of Finders in Property Law

Case Brief: Armory v. Delamirie

Court: King's Bench
Citation: 1 Strange 505; 93 Eng. Rep. 664 (1722)
Date Decided: 1722

Facts:

In this case, the plaintiff, Armory, was a chimney sweep who found a jewel in the defendant's shop. Armory took the jewel to Delamirie, a goldsmith, for appraisal. Delamirie, after examining the jewel, refused to return it to Armory and instead kept it, claiming it as his own. Armory filed a lawsuit to recover the value of the jewel or its return.

Issue:

The key legal issue was whether Armory, as the finder of the jewel, had a superior claim to its ownership over Delamirie, who had possession of it.

Holding:

The court held in favor of Armory, affirming the rights of a finder to possess an item against all but the rightful owner.

Reasoning:

The court reasoned that a finder of property has rights to it, unless the original owner comes forward to claim it. The ruling established that possession is a strong indication of ownership, and it is presumed that the finder is entitled to keep the property unless there is evidence of prior ownership. The court emphasized that Delamirie, having taken possession of the jewel without a claim of ownership, could not claim it against the finder. As a result, Armory was entitled to either the jewel or its value.

Conclusion:

Armory v. Delamirie set a significant precedent in property law regarding the rights of finders. It established the principle that a finder may retain possession of a found item against all but the true owner, thereby protecting the rights of individuals who discover lost or abandoned property.

---

List of Cases Cited

1. South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Sharman, [1896] 2 Q.B. 44 - Discussed the rights of finders in relation to property found on private property and established that finders have rights over lost property against all but the rightful owner.
2. Hannah v. Peel, [1945] 1 K.B. 509 - Analyzed the implications of finding property on another's premises, distinguishing between rights of the finder and the owner of the land.

Similar Cases

1. Parker v. British Airways Board, [1982] 1 W.L.R. 301 - Explored the rights of a finder in a public place and affirmed that finders have rights over lost items found in public spaces.
2. McAvoy v. Medina, 11 Allen 548 (1865) - Addressed the issue of ownership in relation to lost property and the responsibilities of finders to make reasonable efforts to return it to the rightful owner.