Sunday, November 29, 2015

Montana v. United States case brief summary

Montana v. United States case brief

Facts: Montana gave contractors different tax treatments depending on if they built public or private projects. A contractor challenged this constitutionality and the U.S. financed them, however, the U.S. also started a federal court action against Montana. The Montana Supreme Court upheld the state’s system of taxation so the U.S. continued its case in federal court. 

Reasoning: Justice Marshall said that although the U.S. was not a direct party, they played a strong enough part in the state court action to be bound by its decision.

Visit: to rid yourself of that social media addition.
Check out our store on Etsy:

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...