Friday, October 10, 2014

Whelan v. Van Natta case brief summary

Whelan v. Van Natta case brief summary

Facts: The plaintiff came into the defendant’s store, and made a purchase. Then, the plaintiff asked for a box that he went to the back room with the defendant's consent to get a
box, and P was injured.
Ruled in favor of the defendant

Issue: Whether the plaintiff’s entering into the backroom after the purchase was made extends his status as an invitee or recategorize him as a licensee.

Rules: A visitor has the status of an invitee only while is on the part of the land to which his invitations extends. If the invitee goes outside of the area of his invitation, he becomes a trespasser or a licensee, depending upon with or without the consent of the possessor.

Analysis: The court stated that the backroom is not the extension of mutual benefit where P is treated as an invitee.  

Conclucion: the outcome of the case at the previous level was affirmed

Co: If the toilet open to the public, it is an invitee
If not, it is licensee

Support us by:
Visiting: to rid yourself of that social media addition.
Checking out our store on Etsy:

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...