Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. Case Brief: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in International Contracts

Case Brief: Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.

Court: United States Supreme Court
Citation: Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506 (1974)
Date: June 24, 1974

Facts:

In this case, Scherk, a German citizen and businessman, entered into a contract with Alberto-Culver Co., a U.S. corporation, regarding the sale of a hair care product. The contract contained a clause mandating that any disputes arising from the agreement would be settled through arbitration in Paris, France. After disputes arose concerning the contract's performance, Scherk sought to bring a lawsuit in federal court in Illinois instead of pursuing arbitration as specified in the agreement. Alberto-Culver Co. moved to dismiss Scherk's lawsuit, arguing that the arbitration clause was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act.

Issue:

The main legal issue was whether the arbitration clause in the contract should be enforced, despite Scherk's objections, and whether such enforcement violated public policy or would be unconscionable.

Holding:

The Supreme Court held that the arbitration clause was valid and enforceable, affirming the principle that parties to a contract are bound by their agreements, including arbitration provisions.

Reasoning:

The Court reasoned that arbitration clauses are generally favored in commercial contracts, especially when parties have freely agreed to them. The enforcement of the arbitration agreement did not violate any public policy or statutory provisions. The Court emphasized the importance of upholding international commercial agreements to promote trade and reduce litigation costs. It noted that allowing one party to bypass an agreed-upon arbitration process undermined the integrity of contractual agreements. The ruling highlighted that the parties had negotiated the arbitration clause knowingly and voluntarily.

Conclusion:

The decision reinforced the enforceability of arbitration agreements in international contracts, affirming the policy that parties should adhere to the terms of their contracts, thereby promoting predictability and stability in international commerce.

---

List of Cases Cited

1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985) - Establishes that arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, even in cases involving statutory claims.
2. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, 350 U.S. 198 (1956) - Discusses the enforceability of arbitration agreements and the role of state law in determining their validity.

Similar Cases

1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) - Examines the enforceability of arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act and the implications of class action waivers.
2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006) - Addresses the validity of arbitration clauses when one party alleges fraud in the contract as a whole.