Saturday, May 17, 2014
Williamson v. Lee Optical case brief summary
Facts/Issue/Holding: OK law made it unlawful for anyone not optometrist or ophthalmologists to fit lenses. Statute specifically exempted “ready-to-wear” sellers. In effect, statute prevented opticians from fitting old glasses into new frames. Court held did not violate EP clause.
· EP clause extends ONLY to invidious discrimination.
· In cases where invidious discrimination not apparent, legislatures may take steps to eliminate some evils but not all without violating the EP clause.
· Legislature may have felt that the “ready-to-wear” branch did not pose as great a problem as the other branches.
Earning a Juris Doctor (JD) degree is a significant accomplishment, opening a wide array of career paths beyond the traditional legal practi...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...