Saturday, May 17, 2014
Truman v. Truman case brief summary
TRUMAN v. TRUMAN
i. Patient elected not to have a pap smear test because she couldn’t afford it
ii. The physician didn’t disclose the risks of not having the diagnostic procedure
iii. He claimed that he didn’t have a duty to disclose the risks once the patient stopped following his advice. I.e. declined the pap smear
iv. Patient died
v. Cal supreme court disagreed
1. YES there was a testimony that patient would not undergo the test because of cost or because she didn’t feel like it but the jury could reasonably conclude that Dr. Thomas had a duty to inform Mrs. Truman of the danger of refusing the test because it was not reasonable for Dr. Thomas to assume that Mrs. Truman appreciated the potentially fatal consequences of her conduct.
2. The rejection of a recommended procedure does not alter the fiducially qualities of the physician-patient relationship, since she still relies on him.
Small Business Tax Tips: Maximizing Deductions and Credits https://pixabay.com/photos/money-bills-calculator-to-save-256312/ Managing a sma...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
Case Brief: Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. 489 U.S. 141 (1989) Facts: In this case, Bonito Boats, Inc. (Bonito) and Thunder...