- Bank of Oklahoma v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation case brief
a. SOVERIGN IMMUNITY
b. Suits against Indian tribes are barred by sovereign immunity absent either clear waiver by tribe or congressional abrogation
c. Sovereign
immunity and doctrine of comity precluded bank from filing interpleader
action in federal district court against Indian tribe to determine
ownership of account funds; bank had to exhaust tribal remedies before
bringing controversy to federal court.
d. Bank
failed to establish that it would be denied due process if conflicting
claims to funds by Indian tribe and manager of tribe's bingo hall would
not be determined in federal court interpleader action, but rather would
have to be pursued in tribal court.
e. EXHAUSTION OF TRIBAL REMEDIES
f. For
reasons of comity, federal court should abstain from hearing cases that
challenge tribal court jurisdiction until tribal court remedies,
including tribal appellate review, are exhausted.
g. Exception
to tribal court exhaustion requirement when there is express
jurisdictional prohibition was inapplicable with respect to bank's
interpleader action against Indian tribe and manager of tribe's bingo
hall, where bank merely speculated that tribal court's temporary
restraining order prohibiting bank from releasing funds to manager was
beyond tribal court jurisdiction and did not point to any express
jurisdictional prohibition which temporary restraining order patently
violated.
h. “Absolute
necessity” exception to Indian tribe's sovereign immunity does not
apply where party voluntarily chooses not to pursue its case in tribal
court.
i. Contract
between Indian tribe and manager of tribe's bingo hall did not
unequivocally express waiver of tribe's sovereign immunity from suit in
nontribal court; agreement provided that court action brought by either
party shall be brought in tribal court, and later provided that tribe
agreed to be subject to suit by manager to declare rights and duties
under agreement.
No comments:
Post a Comment