Greaves v. McGee case brief summary
492 So. 2d 307 (1986)
CASE FACTS
The landowners filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against the minerals lessee and county lessor to establish the ownership of minerals underlying a public road that crossed the landowners' property. The minerals lessee counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment in his favor.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The lower court entered judgment for the landowners, holding that the original grantor had only conveyed the county lessor a right of way across the land. The minerals lessee appealed and the court affirmed the judgment.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed a declaratory judgment against the minerals lessee and establishing the landowners' ownership of minerals under a public road across the landowners' property.
Suggested law school study materials
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vODKFBd-0eiMUDIgl4zOomr7A_KlDG1p5duZz2mvAe6UTlo7TLxMePYWDVNDpdpIVBQGOvA1_29yOIJpywJvzn-ZydaKZUkuZEjWQeqCSCtTnNfYJBo1oc4cLR1aKlerSbkmQ2sH95V8sEeNQUd0Oj6e2bqk4UFKG1nyBrbq1gaa7tgJl0XYXWg0md5guSugMIzQAeekCEU3C__poCtJxPaYYv8VPNppiXH7A9FkpbB3y8UwLHOoMg3B49l8ZJSIoyJ5ZGErmW89si=s0-d)
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_thWPBpgdCxWv7UoY6oIF-aSztKIf0u9xmKyREu5gXx8j5lEWYKa2Bnt85su6c_qZuDyIEu4gU7ybtu24f94U0OgT7j6FUOpmC320oC0tRvyGUJnmrZbKiyE2Dm-cGdp5l6tLab3McWRoTMH_zbjeYZJ4jLILNosvQOHAzlgWAcX70c5zGwsLSkvv4zQ51xxG_xqT56XA9rBqvfTyvAz0S-zwV6Znt2HNkwyuy9waO1o_ymHfUHqQCtHaZOPkKq1GiJt6d12IF1Pz8=s0-d)
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tYljEauO1pBmxOpgqVfCGJV75MkLKbK5erarmmw9hMbX07yFdDt0CPfr0iTocFIDKmy6-4-X36u6nc-ve9Kc3pCOYip4-MumDsrSLUudagVElozoMwUJX2PA6keTYkJBweuRnvExw3cN-QqrzAurQN2I6sRr-wVmrsqa-QzSZx6YCu92beeT7_tSNiHpPYxx0BHJmcZMpZs57bA0sdN11LcS77yB7QlG7dyCwxJg7izA07la-j5phwro4DA-EOZk5MxIQa7-aVFG9V=s0-d)
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sBtWFPc1a-xiiDiwK-xfD_kPBM15lPZcHtcdmfg_GguI6olOB2m-6wRipC0k8wDmJM39A9c3nrLx7Od3_VJlzucydju6DNNocA6h9243Ey3_q83v5hOo9xNp0I8JkuzsTEFJ-jCBDIf1_jbuvM5Gq52VJxQqfm1fmm391rbCJTIcbFab6cXv1TdYVz8K5jAJ64mVFolrLCi9IMXwhFZ-TG-EKEkfxiiJRo4oD-cIAVUDjFr8JtpvrCCP19vMcXSRHWqWLQJ5OxmF9I=s0-d)
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
492 So. 2d 307 (1986)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant minerals lessee challenged an
order from the Circuit Court for Lamar County (Alabama), which found
in favor of appellee landowners in a declaratory judgment action
seeking the establishment of rights in minerals underlying a public
road that crossed the landowners' property.CASE FACTS
The landowners filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against the minerals lessee and county lessor to establish the ownership of minerals underlying a public road that crossed the landowners' property. The minerals lessee counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment in his favor.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The lower court entered judgment for the landowners, holding that the original grantor had only conveyed the county lessor a right of way across the land. The minerals lessee appealed and the court affirmed the judgment.
DISCUSSION
- The court held that the county lessor had only a right of way for the express purpose of constructing and maintaining the public road.
- The court found that the deed was replete with references to the limited purpose of the conveyance, an open description contained in the deed strongly implied that no conveyance of a fee simply was contemplated, and the grantor's uncertainty as to the location of the road was not consistent with the intent to convey a fee interest.
- The court also found that the county lessor's response to the landowners' request for admissions admitted that the deed conveyed to it only a right of way.
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed a declaratory judgment against the minerals lessee and establishing the landowners' ownership of minerals under a public road across the landowners' property.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
No comments:
Post a Comment