Toker v. Westerman case brief summary
274 A.2d 78 (1970)
CASE FACTS
The seller's assignor sold a refrigerator-freezer to the purchaser under a retail installment contract for $ 1,229.76. The purchaser made payments over a period of time, but resisted payment of the balance in the sum, claiming that the unit was so greatly overpriced as to make the contract unenforceable under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-302.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court found in favor of the purchaser in the seller's action seeking the sum due on a refrigerator-freezer sold to the purchaser.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
274 A.2d 78 (1970)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff seller filed an action
seeking the remaining payments for a refrigerator-freezer sold to
defendant purchaser.CASE FACTS
The seller's assignor sold a refrigerator-freezer to the purchaser under a retail installment contract for $ 1,229.76. The purchaser made payments over a period of time, but resisted payment of the balance in the sum, claiming that the unit was so greatly overpriced as to make the contract unenforceable under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-302.
DISCUSSION
- The court found in favor of the purchaser and held that it found as shocking and unconscionable that the sale of goods was for approximately two and one-half times their reasonable retail value.
- It was particularly so because the sale was made by a door-to-door salesman for a dealer who therefore would have had less overhead expense than a dealer maintaining a store or showroom.
CONCLUSION
The court found in favor of the purchaser in the seller's action seeking the sum due on a refrigerator-freezer sold to the purchaser.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment