Toker v. Westerman case brief summary
274 A.2d 78 (1970)
CASE FACTS
The seller's assignor sold a refrigerator-freezer to the purchaser under a retail installment contract for $ 1,229.76. The purchaser made payments over a period of time, but resisted payment of the balance in the sum, claiming that the unit was so greatly overpriced as to make the contract unenforceable under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-302.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court found in favor of the purchaser in the seller's action seeking the sum due on a refrigerator-freezer sold to the purchaser.
Suggested law school study materials




Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
274 A.2d 78 (1970)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff seller filed an action
seeking the remaining payments for a refrigerator-freezer sold to
defendant purchaser.CASE FACTS
The seller's assignor sold a refrigerator-freezer to the purchaser under a retail installment contract for $ 1,229.76. The purchaser made payments over a period of time, but resisted payment of the balance in the sum, claiming that the unit was so greatly overpriced as to make the contract unenforceable under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-302.
DISCUSSION
- The court found in favor of the purchaser and held that it found as shocking and unconscionable that the sale of goods was for approximately two and one-half times their reasonable retail value.
- It was particularly so because the sale was made by a door-to-door salesman for a dealer who therefore would have had less overhead expense than a dealer maintaining a store or showroom.
CONCLUSION
The court found in favor of the purchaser in the seller's action seeking the sum due on a refrigerator-freezer sold to the purchaser.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
No comments:
Post a Comment