Rita v. United States case brief

Rita v. United States case brief summary
551 U.S. 338 (2007)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Defendant was convicted of offenses related to providing false testimony to a grand jury, but defendant asserted that his sentence was improperly subjected to a presumption of reasonableness on review and that the sentence was unreasonable. Upon the grant of a writ of certiorari, defendant appealed the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit which affirmed defendant's sentence.

CASE FACTS
Defendant contended that lower appellate court review of his sentence improperly applied a presumption of reasonableness merely because the sentence was within the range properly calculated under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (Guidelines). Defendant also argued that the sentencing court failed to explain sufficiently its reasons for declining a lower sentence based on defendant's health, his fear of abuse in prison, and his distinguished military service.

DISCUSSION

• The U.S. Supreme Court first held that the lower appellate court properly applied a presumption of reasonableness to defendant's within-Guidelines sentence, since the presumption was not binding, did not reflect strong judicial deference, and merely recognized that a sentencing court's discretionary sentence which was also in accord with the advisory Guidelines was probably reasonable. 
• Further, the sentencing court's statement of reasons, albeit brief, sufficiently indicated that defendant's arguments for a lower sentence were considered and deemed to be inadequate to warrant leniency outside the Guidelines, and the circumstances identified by defendant were not in fact special enough to warrant a lower sentence.

CONCLUSION
The judgment affirming defendant's sentence was affirmed.


Suggested law school study materials

Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.