Lofton v. Secretary of the Department of Children and Family
Services case brief summary
358 F.3d 804 (2004)
CASE FACTS
The statute specifically prohibited adoption by a homosexual person. The appellant individuals had been caring for the appellant children as foster parents and guardians.
DISCUSSION
The appellate court affirmed the lower court's summary judgment to the state over an equal protection and due process challenge by homosexual persons desiring to adopt.
Suggested law school course materials, hornbooks, and guides for Constitutional Law




Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
358 F.3d 804 (2004)
CASE SYNOPSIS
In the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida appellants, homosexual individuals
and the children they wished to adopt, sued defendant state officials
alleging Fla. Stat. § 63.042(3) violated their fundamental
rights and equal protection. Appellants also sought class
certification for two classes. The court denied class certification
and granted summary judgment for the state on all counts. Appellants
sought review.CASE FACTS
The statute specifically prohibited adoption by a homosexual person. The appellant individuals had been caring for the appellant children as foster parents and guardians.
DISCUSSION
- Inter alia, the court held that the statute was constitutional as enacted and as subsequently enforced. Appellants' right-to-family-integrity argument failed to state a claim.
- There was no precedent for appellants' novel proposition that long-term foster care arrangements and guardianships were entitled to constitutional protection akin to that accorded to natural and adoptive families.
- The court also declined appellants' invitation to recognize a new fundamental right to family integrity for groups of individuals who had formed deeply loving and interdependent relationships.
- Further, the Lawrence decision could not be extrapolated to create a right to adopt for homosexual persons.
- As to the Equal Protection challenge, there were plausible rational reasons for the disparate treatment of homosexuals and heterosexual singles under Florida adoption law.
- To the extent that the classification might have been imperfect, that imperfection did not rise to the level of a constitutional infraction.
The appellate court affirmed the lower court's summary judgment to the state over an equal protection and due process challenge by homosexual persons desiring to adopt.
Suggested law school course materials, hornbooks, and guides for Constitutional Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
No comments:
Post a Comment