268 N.E.2d 751 (1971)
The employee was a dentist who was employed by a dental practice. He signed a covenant not to compete. The employer's practice consisted solely of oral surgery. The covenant, however, restricted the employee from practicing both dentistry and oral surgery. When the employee left the practice and opened his own office, the employer sued to enforce the covenant.
The trial court gave judgment for the employer. The lower appellate court reversed, finding the restriction against practicing dentistry was too broad.
- On further review, the court reversed the order of the lower appellate court, holding that an unreasonable restriction in the agreement should be severed and the remainder of the agreement given effect.
- The court held that the employer was entitled to an injunction barring the former employee from practicing oral surgery in the five specified counties named in the covenant and that it was also entitled to damages actually suffered while the former employee conducted his practice after leaving his employment.
The court reversed the decision.
Suggested law school course materials, hornbooks, and guides for Contract Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.