Dindo v. Whitney case brief summary
451 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1971)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiff was driving defendant, a passenger in his own car, when the car went off the road, injuring plaintiff. Defendant sued plaintiff and defendant's own insurer paid defendant a sum within policy limits. Two years later, plaintiff sued defendant alleging that the accident was caused by defendant putting his hand through the steering wheel in reaching for a flashlight. Plaintiff alleged he didn't realize he had a claim against defendant until he spoke with new counsel. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.
DISCUSSION
Order granting defendant's motion to dismiss vacated and remanded for a hearing on the merits because the court may have wanted to consider the effect of the cooperation clause in defendant's insurance policy.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
451 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1971)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff appealed an order of the
United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire
granting defendant's motion to dismiss an action involving a
counterclaim.CASE FACTS
Plaintiff was driving defendant, a passenger in his own car, when the car went off the road, injuring plaintiff. Defendant sued plaintiff and defendant's own insurer paid defendant a sum within policy limits. Two years later, plaintiff sued defendant alleging that the accident was caused by defendant putting his hand through the steering wheel in reaching for a flashlight. Plaintiff alleged he didn't realize he had a claim against defendant until he spoke with new counsel. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, defendant argued that plaintiff's action was barred by reason of plaintiff having failed to assert it as a compulsory counterclaim in the prior action.
- Plaintiff argued that the compulsory counterclaim rule was inapplicable to him since the original action was settled, rather than pursued to judgment.
- The court ordered a hearing on the merits, with the facts to be found by a jury.
Order granting defendant's motion to dismiss vacated and remanded for a hearing on the merits because the court may have wanted to consider the effect of the cooperation clause in defendant's insurance policy.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment