The Hebrew University Association v. Nye case brief
summary
169 A.2d 641 (1961)
CASE FACTS
The decedent inherited a large library from her late husband, a professor. During her lifetime, she told the university that she was making a gift of the library to it and even went so far as to attend a luncheon in her honor and make a formal announcement of her gift. However, she never actually tendered possession of the library to the university, although she did prepare it for shipping. Upon her death, the decedent bequeathed the bulk of her estate to a charitable trust or foundation. The university was not mentioned in the decedent's will.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court set aside the trial court's judgment in favor of the university and ordered a new trial.
Suggested Study Aids For Wills, Trusts & Estate Law
169 A.2d 641 (1961)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff university filed
suit against defendant executors, seeking a declaratory judgment
determining the ownership of certain books and other articles making
up a library that belonged to the decedent and for an injunction. The
Superior Court of New Haven County (Connecticut) entered a judgment
finding the university to be the owner of the library. The executors
appealed.CASE FACTS
The decedent inherited a large library from her late husband, a professor. During her lifetime, she told the university that she was making a gift of the library to it and even went so far as to attend a luncheon in her honor and make a formal announcement of her gift. However, she never actually tendered possession of the library to the university, although she did prepare it for shipping. Upon her death, the decedent bequeathed the bulk of her estate to a charitable trust or foundation. The university was not mentioned in the decedent's will.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the court held that the trial court's judgment declaring that the university was the owner of the library was without support in the findings and could not stand.
- The court held that, at most, the decedent had the requisite donative intent such that, had she subsequently made a delivery of the property while that intent persisted, there would have been a valid, legal gift inter vivos.
- The court refused to remand the case for the entry of judgment in the executors' favor, however, due to certain inconsistencies in the findings of the trial court.
- Therefore, the court remanded the case for a new trial.
CONCLUSION
The court set aside the trial court's judgment in favor of the university and ordered a new trial.
Suggested Study Aids For Wills, Trusts & Estate Law
No comments:
Post a Comment