Strandell v. Jackson County, Illinois case brief summary
838 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1987)
CASE FACTS
The attorney was ordered by the district court to participate in a nonbinding jury trial, which was a settlement device whereby the attorneys summarized their case before a jury, which then rendered a nonbinding verdict. The district court cited Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 as authority for the order.
DISCUSSION
The criminal contempt judgment against plaintiffs' attorney was vacated.
Recommended Supplements for Civil Procedure
838 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1987)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiffs, parents of deceased inmate,
filed suit against defendants, county jail and others, for claims
related to the suicide of the inmate. Plaintiffs' attorney appealed
from a judgment of criminal contempt entered by the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois for refusing to
participate in a nonbinding summary jury trial.CASE FACTS
The attorney was ordered by the district court to participate in a nonbinding jury trial, which was a settlement device whereby the attorneys summarized their case before a jury, which then rendered a nonbinding verdict. The district court cited Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 as authority for the order.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the court vacated the criminal contempt order, holding that Rule 16 did not permit the district court to compel parties to participate in summary jury trials.
- The rule was not designed as a means of clubbing the parties into an involuntary settlement.
The criminal contempt judgment against plaintiffs' attorney was vacated.
Recommended Supplements for Civil Procedure
No comments:
Post a Comment