Stark v. Flemming case brief summary
283 F.2d 410 (1960)
CASE FACTS
Appellant social security beneficiary contested a ruling of appellee federal agency and the district court that the corporation in which she placed her assets was a sham.
DISCUSSION
The court reversed the judgment for appellee federal agency because the corporation in which appellant social security beneficiary had placed her assets was not a sham. The court remanded for a reappraisal of appellant's salary because appellee could determine a reasonable salary for appellant.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations and Business Associations Law
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tLA4A71HPA3C9t1Ui3Q18-EwMAlVk94iY6-NWtjTTrgT_PcnEpi5rb9aBN6sLo8d4lZV4THAR5fWYPakoUs5gIYuJr5LVoorIl_a5UAULotkoICFtIjkpoyQLVX1hxwj5H09hq9NHPlPVDabe090Mli6uQuZUTIzfm0aUwx7hCKhrwVcpHL1_B_jICGPL6XW8GLOz3VUkBznHD2chnead7YeV6gjGLdFPAaIPzOhDP9M9ZXI6-KmuKphYF9VekA33kGA9MprXDAiY=s0-d)
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uGkjsLrwRbPr2VZkglmaGzA5huliId3ohha69vW0R9b2gApndyD5zmf7utmN2tFqztAJNYpF8mDwYxTfsmO3UY0SxYUY0FNiZBCsAYSL9n7KQwR7axoy5yj7D9WfPN6akHuqQ-OrztHPeglqU8w63rXb9KT2LTgi4m2GvO-5Ttlve9cihU0tq4ShDNxPtmyLvtx3KkvJrfvBvYTvy7lmAXuGUXZkFsWojaBOs2iN8tznYDga0OzsYQ29DGSVSute8tPYfKMgSkiANj=s0-d)
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uFgbOZsBLT9dVAvY4uXQMKhrxrZzjT0nTBkXbE--kC-sprGXD-wIMmq9l4NwZblTBFcYWrOkOHoS20b5JAA_Ptsj1qKWV6yP_LT9ozPp2fwptN5CSz3WhqSlwwlDBXVcKMzHyBgx8FjtWiwIF4950Y25l41KCOGMXkuFY3if-mXyfvpFN1ySWTf_03_943yqUALgYsfHpJtKS9mRcWSHoNF-Knq15RMLZS8nO1LnzG3qC9t_ckZdGmxd31QDmhNsQmVpMQGROQoEQ=s0-d)
283 F.2d 410 (1960)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant social security beneficiary
challenged a judgment of a United States District Court in favor of
appellee federal agency, which found that a corporation established
by appellant was a sham for purpose of qualifying appellant for
social security payments.CASE FACTS
Appellant social security beneficiary contested a ruling of appellee federal agency and the district court that the corporation in which she placed her assets was a sham.
DISCUSSION
- The court found that appellant had placed her assets of a farm and a duplex house in a corporation and drew a small salary with the result being her qualification for social security payments.
- Because appellant had adhered to corporate procedures, the court concluded that the corporate arrangement was not a sham and reversed the denial of benefits on that basis.
- The court, however, remanded because appellee could reappraise the salary appellant was receiving and determine a reasonable salary for her services.
The court reversed the judgment for appellee federal agency because the corporation in which appellant social security beneficiary had placed her assets was not a sham. The court remanded for a reappraisal of appellant's salary because appellee could determine a reasonable salary for appellant.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations and Business Associations Law
No comments:
Post a Comment