Rogers v. State case brief
760 S.W.2d 669
760 S.W.2d 669
CASE SYNOPSIS: Defendant sought review
of an order from the District Court of Hopkins County (Texas)
convicting her of allowing dog fights on her property.
FACTS
FACTS
Defendant was charged with allowing dog fights on her property. The
jury convicted her and assessed punishment at four years confinement
and a $ 2000 fine. The imposition of sentence was suspended and
defendant was placed on probation for four years.
DISCUSSION
On appeal, the
court affirmed, finding that no search warrant was required by the
police because Fourth Amendment protection did not extend to
defendant's open field. The court noted that the dog pit was located
on defendant's property in an open section of the woods nearly 400
yards from defendant's mobile home. The dog pit was obviously not
within the curtilage of defendant's habitation. The court further
found that the statute that defendant was convicted under was not
unconstitutionally vague.
CONCLUSION: The order convicting defendant of allowing dog fights on her property was affirmed because Fourth Amendment protection did not extend to defendant's open field. The dog pit was located on defendant's property in an open section of the woods nearly 400 yards from defendant's mobile home.
CONCLUSION: The order convicting defendant of allowing dog fights on her property was affirmed because Fourth Amendment protection did not extend to defendant's open field. The dog pit was located on defendant's property in an open section of the woods nearly 400 yards from defendant's mobile home.
No comments:
Post a Comment