Kyles v. Whitley case brief summary
514 U.S. 419 (1995)
CASE FACTS
Petitioner was convicted of first-degree murder. He appealed, claiming that the State knew of evidence favorable to him before and during trial that it failed to disclose. The State supreme court remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing on defendant's claims of newly discovered evidence.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial court, after review, denied relief. The state supreme court denied petitioner's application for discretionary review. A petition for habeas corpus was then filed in district court, which denied the petition. The court of appeals affirmed by a divided vote.
DISCUSSION
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed and ordered a new trial, holding that the net effect of the evidence withheld by the State in this case raised a reasonable probability that its disclosure would have produced a different result.
CONCLUSION
Petitioner's conviction was reversed and remanded for a new trial ordered because the omitted evidence favoring petitioner could have potentially resulted in a different verdict.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure: Examples & Explanations, Sixth Edition
Emanuel Law Outline: Criminal Procedure
514 U.S. 419 (1995)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner challenged a first-degree
murder conviction claiming that the State failed to disclose evidence
favorable to him. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the
denial of petitioner's habeas corpus petition, and petitioner was
granted certiorari.CASE FACTS
Petitioner was convicted of first-degree murder. He appealed, claiming that the State knew of evidence favorable to him before and during trial that it failed to disclose. The State supreme court remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing on defendant's claims of newly discovered evidence.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial court, after review, denied relief. The state supreme court denied petitioner's application for discretionary review. A petition for habeas corpus was then filed in district court, which denied the petition. The court of appeals affirmed by a divided vote.
DISCUSSION
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed and ordered a new trial, holding that the net effect of the evidence withheld by the State in this case raised a reasonable probability that its disclosure would have produced a different result.
CONCLUSION
Petitioner's conviction was reversed and remanded for a new trial ordered because the omitted evidence favoring petitioner could have potentially resulted in a different verdict.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure: Examples & Explanations, Sixth Edition
Emanuel Law Outline: Criminal Procedure
No comments:
Post a Comment