In re Tyvonne case brief summary
558 A.2d 661 (1989)
CASE FACTS
The juvenile, who was an eight-year-old boy, and the victim, another child, began arguing over whether a pistol that the juvenile had found was real. The victim challenged the respondent again by saying, "Shoot me, shoot me." The juvenile exclaimed, "I'll show you it's real." He then pointed the pistol at the victim, pulled the trigger, and fired one shot, which struck and injured her.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial court made an adjudication that the juvenile was a delinquent based on a finding that he had committed assault in the second degree in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-60(a)(2).
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court found no error.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
558 A.2d 661 (1989)
CASE SYNOPSIS
In a petition for an adjudication of
delinquency, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district
of Hartford-New Britain, Juvenile Matters at Hartford (Connecticut)
and tried to that court, respondent juvenile appealed from a
judgment adjudicating him a delinquent and committing him to the
custody of the department of children and youth services, a judgment
entered after the juvenile's motion for judgment of acquittal was
denied.CASE FACTS
The juvenile, who was an eight-year-old boy, and the victim, another child, began arguing over whether a pistol that the juvenile had found was real. The victim challenged the respondent again by saying, "Shoot me, shoot me." The juvenile exclaimed, "I'll show you it's real." He then pointed the pistol at the victim, pulled the trigger, and fired one shot, which struck and injured her.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial court made an adjudication that the juvenile was a delinquent based on a finding that he had committed assault in the second degree in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-60(a)(2).
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the court held that the common law defense of infancy did not apply to juvenile delinquency proceedings.
- The court was not persuaded by the juvenile's proposition that the juvenile justice system punished rather than rehabilitated so that there was no good reason not to recognize incapacity as a defense.
- The court rejected the juvenile's argument to the effect that the common law presumption that children between the ages of 7 and 14 were incapable of committing a crime should apply because the offense charged was a serious juvenile offense.
CONCLUSION
The court found no error.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
No comments:
Post a Comment