Braschi v. Stahl Associates, Co. case
brief summary
74 N.Y.2d 201 (1989)
74 N.Y.2d 201 (1989)
CASE SYNOPSIS: Appellant tenant sought
review of the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court
in the First Judicial Department (New York) reversing a lower court
order granting a motion by the tenant for a preliminary injunction
and enjoining respondent landlord from evicting the tenant from the
apartment at which he resided, and denying the tenant's motion.
ISSUE
The issue was whether, on his motion for a preliminary injunction, the tenant failed to establish, as a matter of law, the requisite clear likelihood of success on the merits of his claim to the protection from eviction provided by § 2204.6(d) of the New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations.
ISSUE
The issue was whether, on his motion for a preliminary injunction, the tenant failed to establish, as a matter of law, the requisite clear likelihood of success on the merits of his claim to the protection from eviction provided by § 2204.6(d) of the New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations.
ARGUMENT
The landlord argued that the term "family member" should have been construed, consistent with New York's intestacy laws, to mean relationships of blood, consanguinity, and adoption in order to effectuate the over-all goal of orderly succession to real property.
HOLDING
The court held that the term family, as used in § 2204.6(d), was not to be rigidly restricted to those people who had formalized their relationship.
DISCUSSION
The landlord argued that the term "family member" should have been construed, consistent with New York's intestacy laws, to mean relationships of blood, consanguinity, and adoption in order to effectuate the over-all goal of orderly succession to real property.
HOLDING
The court held that the term family, as used in § 2204.6(d), was not to be rigidly restricted to those people who had formalized their relationship.
DISCUSSION
- The intended protection against sudden eviction was not to rest on fictitious legal distinctions or genetic history, but instead should have had its foundation in the reality of family life.
- In the context of eviction, a more realistic view of a family included two adult lifetime partners whose relationship was long term and characterized by an emotional and financial commitment and interdependence.
No comments:
Post a Comment