Saturday, December 1, 2012

Haslem v. Lockwood case brief

      • Haslem v. Lockwood (Conn, 1871, p14) [Manure pile-maker (P) v. Manure taker (D)]

        • Rule: Abandoned property belongs to the first occupant, the P, who had “changed its original condition and greatly enhanced its value by his labor.”

        • D argues that P leaving it overnight means P lost his rights… but:

        • Q: “If a party finds property comparatively worthless… and greatly increases its value by his labor and expense, does he lose his rights if he leaves it a reasonable time to procure the means to take it away, when such a means are necessary for its removal?” A: NO.

        • Facts: P raked into heaps manure that had accumulated in a public street , intending to carry it away the next day. Before he could do so, D found the heaps and hauled them off in his cart. Court held for P.

Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Landmark Personal Injury Lawsuits and Their Lasting Impact

According to a Forbes article, personal injury lawsuits are civil actions brought by an injured person against the party responsible for the...