Tuesday, October 16, 2012

A.D. Juilliard v. American Woolen case brief

A.D. Juilliard v. American Woolen case summary
259 F.2d 837 (Rhode Island, 1943)


-Atlantic Mills leased premises to Riverside for a term of 62 years under a covenant to pay rent and certain charges as set forth in the agreement. 
-There were no restrictions on assignment nor the identification of responsible party in the event of an assignment. The PL was the successor to the rights of the original lessor after 43 yrs.
-Between 1893 and 1939 (46 yrs) the lease was assigned six times.
-In none of these assignments did the assignee agree to assume the obligation to pay rent for the unexpired term.

Does the assignment of a lease, by the defendant, American to Reo, make the assignee American (as a colorable assignee) liable for the payment of unpaid rent for the entire unexpired term of the lease?


A case of assumpsit to recover rent and taxes. Bench trial held for the defendant.  Plaintiff appealed.  Court affirmed.

Law or Rule(s):
An assignee who does not expressly assume payment of the rental amount stipulated to in the original lease is liable only for such rent as accrues while privity exists.

The lessor has it within his power to protect himself against any detriment to him by incorporating adequate provisions in the lease concerning assignments. 
-If the lessor chooses to execute a lease with out adequately protecting his rights as a lessor, he cannot thereafter complain he was deprived of a benefit.
-All expenses, including rent payments were paid by check of the defendant and then charged against it subsidiary.
-The trial court found that under such circumstances the D, in paying in this manner, was not assuming the covenants of the lease. 
-The D was not bound to pay rent to the PL for the entire unexpired term of the lease through its course of dealing w/ Pls predecessor in title, Atlantic Mills. 
-Exception: Unless fraudulent or colorable, a new assignment of the lease terminates the assignee’s liability to the lessor for rent subsequently accruing. 
-Textile was created as a medium for the sale of certain useless or unprofitable property by Df. The lease and some vacant land were such properties that the Df considered useless or unprofitable. 
-Oster bought them in the name of Reo, in which D had no interest. Oster testified “sole reason of using it and making money with it.”  Reo had exclusive control and possession of the property and no evidence to the contrary was offered.
-Although the purchase amount was small, this fact is not enough to render the assignment colorable.

Plaintiff’s Argument:
The assignee of a lease of real property is liable for the payment of the stipulated rent for the entire unexpired term, notwithstanding that the assignee did not agree to assume such obligation

Defendant’s Argument:
Although the defendant assigned the lease to subsidiary corporations, the assignment to Reo, a non-subsidiary, released the defendant from liability for the unpaid rent and taxes during the unexpired term of the lease.

Privity of estate: A mutual or successive relation to the same right in property such as that which exists between a lessor and lessee or their successors.  A sub-tenant, who is in privity with the original lessor, may avail himself to any covenants in the original lease which “touch and concern” the land.

Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Want to actually do well enough to crush the bar exam at the end and reel in the big job?  Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Landmark Personal Injury Lawsuits and Their Lasting Impact

According to a Forbes article, personal injury lawsuits are civil actions brought by an injured person against the party responsible for the...