Richardson v. United States
-
- Defendant Richardson was charged with violating CCE as the head of the Undertaker Vice Lords, who (among other things) distributed drugs in Chicago.
- Defendant challenged his conviction based upon the “series of violations” requirement.
- In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court said that, by the terms of § 848, the trial jury’s CCE conviction was only proper the jury unanimously agreed on what each of the “violations” were in the “series,” and they must agree on at least 3 violations in order to make up a series. (In other words, the court’s review focused upon the word “violations” instead of the word “series.”) Judgment vacated, case remanded to be decided on those terms.
- Spirited dissent said that focusing on 3 individual violations within an enterprise that continuously committed thousands missed the purpose of the statute.
No comments:
Post a Comment