- People v. Kevorkian- ∆ convicted of assisting in two suicides, contended that a person had a due process right to commit suicide; therefore, the state statute under which he was prosecuted was unconstitutional.
- No due process right to suicide exists.
- Court of Appeals remands b/c trial court did not have benefit in this guidance and strongly suggests that he didn’t participate in the final act.
- In case at hand women were really sick, we can feel comfortable that they weren’t pressured, they really wanted to kill themselves
- Would we think differently if the person was just really depressed?
- Is the rule “Consent is no defense to homicide” problematic?
- Case at hand is not homicide because it was not Kevorkian who did it…
- But how does this reconcile Welansky or Acosta??? It can’t be the rule that you are guilty of homicide if you are the one who does the final act.
- Did ∆ cause the death or did the two victims???
Case briefs for law students, lawyers, and others researching case law. I created many of these briefs in law school and periodically update them from time to time. My goal has been to build a one stop resource center for law students!
Friday, September 14, 2012
People v. Kevorkian case brief
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Full Outline of The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest
The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest The Mountain Is You by Brianna Wiest is a transformative self-help book that delves into self-sabo...
-
Case Brief: Brisboy v. Fireboard Paper Products Corporation Court: Michigan Supreme Court Citation: 429 Mich. 540, 418 N.W.2d 650 (1988) D...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...
No comments:
Post a Comment