Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., Supreme Court, 1926
- Zoning regulations segregated the land uses throughout the city, in so doing they allegedly decreased the value of P’s property by 75%. P alleges the ordinance is unconstitutional b/c it denies the right of due process. Conflict over whether the City was acting beyond its State-authorized powers under the ZEA.
- Holding: The state has the power to restrict the use of one’s property
- Zoning regulations are only void IF: (1) they are arbitrary, and (2) have no substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare.
No comments:
Post a Comment