Friday, March 23, 2012

TEDLA V. ELLMAN case brief

TEDLA V. ELLMAN

• 1933 statute – pedestrians must walk to the left of the center lines (walk against the traffic coming toward you)
• P were walking eastbound with traffic – clear violation of the statute
• Plaintiffs were walking with traffic because their was less traffic on the eastbound side of the highway
• purpose of the statute is to prevent accidents (obviously)
• when the unusual occurs (like much more traffic on one side of the highway than the other side), the legislature would still want the safety of pedestrians
• substantive intent is to promote safety – if we can promote safety by excusing P’s violation of statute, then we should do so
holding for pedestrians

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads

https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...