Friday, March 23, 2012

RANDI W. V. MUROC USD case brief


• Def referred Gadams to pls school district despite complaints.
• Gadams sexually assaulted pl.
• pl sues defs for liability in failing to exercise reasonable care in reccomending gadams
Issues: Duty of care to pl? breach of duty by misrepresentations or false info?
• 1: because of forseeability, defs did owe a duty to pl not to misrepresent gadams’ qualifications.
• 2: found defs recommendations misleading
• Court upheld claims of negligent misrepresentation and fraud but dismissed negligence per se.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...