- Facts: Embry was working as a salesman and wanted an employment K. Got what he considered to be an assurance from his boss that he would get one, but was fired instead. He lost the opportunity to go work somewhere else.
- Issue: did the formation of the K depend on the intention of BOTH parties?
- Holding: it’s a matter of law whether or not the boss’ words could be understood by a reasonable person as agreeing to form a K.
- Rule: if a reasonable person would have taken a party’s words to constitute assent to the formation of a K, then that K will be enforceable, even if one party did not intend for there to be a K.
- Commentary: objective standard. If what D staid would have been taken by a reasonable person to be an employment contract, and P so understood it to be so, it constitutes a valid K.
Friday, March 23, 2012
Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co. case brief
Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.; (Ct of Appeals of Missouri, 1907)
Objective vs. Subjective Approach
Earning a Juris Doctor (JD) degree is a significant accomplishment, opening a wide array of career paths beyond the traditional legal practi...
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...