Baehr v. Lewin (1993)
Holding: State action sex discrimination requiring strong justification under the EPA to Hawaii’s Constitution.
Facts: Two gay couples filed suit and alleged that Hawaii’s Marriage Law was unconstitutional b/c it denied same-sex couples the same marriage rights as different sex couples.
Holding: State action sex discrimination requiring strong justification under the EPA to Hawaii’s Constitution.
- Denied of rights and benefits allotted to married couples.
- HI Marriage Law deemed unconstitutional unless D can show that the sex-based classification is justified by compelling state interests and that the statute was narrowly tailored to avoid affecting the appellants constitutional rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment