FACTS
-Action seeking damages brought on behalf of 11 year old P who lost thumb when 11 years old in snowmobile accident.
ISSUE
-Child's operation and resulting injuries using a snowmobile as an inherently dangerous activity. Is the child liable for those injuries?
HOLDING
-Yes, when the activity a child engages in is inherently dangerous, as is the operation of powerful mechanized vehicles, the child should be held to an adult standard of care.
ANALYSIS
-Child should be held to the standard of care of an adult in this case.
The best place for complete law school case briefs and law-related news. Want to advertise or post sponsored content? contact us at mrmetropolitan@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Landmark Personal Injury Lawsuits and Their Lasting Impact
According to a Forbes article, personal injury lawsuits are civil actions brought by an injured person against the party responsible for the...

-
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
-
Corthell v. Summit Thread Company (1933) · Facts: Corthell is a salesman for Summit. He invents contraption that is bought b...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
No comments:
Post a Comment