Manning v. Loew case brief summary
46 N.E.2d 1022 (1943)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiff filed an action of contract against defendant, claiming they had an agreement where plaintiff would be a companion for the defendant in exchange for his obtaining a screen test for her to become an actress.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the action of the judge in directing a verdict for the defendant and overruled the plaintiff's exceptions.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
46 N.E.2d 1022 (1943)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff appealed from a decision of
the Suffolk Superior Court (Massachusetts) directing a verdict for
the defendant in plaintiff's action for breach of contract.CASE FACTS
Plaintiff filed an action of contract against defendant, claiming they had an agreement where plaintiff would be a companion for the defendant in exchange for his obtaining a screen test for her to become an actress.
DISCUSSION
- The court here determined that the action of the trial judge in directing a verdict for the defendant was not error, and that there was a variance between the declaration of the plaintiff and the proof offered.
- The court found that plaintiff's admitted sexual conduct with the defendant was not consistent with her promise to act as a daughter to the defendant .
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the action of the judge in directing a verdict for the defendant and overruled the plaintiff's exceptions.
Suggested law school study materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment