- Facts: homeowners brought suit against apartment complex for noise nuisance: massive air conditioning unit for the 115-unit apartment complex. Ps had suffered $10k damages up to date of trial. Before granting injunction in Texas, the courts have to balance the equalities (is the benefit of relief to P greater than negative effect of relief to D).
- Rule: Even though a jury finds facts constituting a nuisance, court must balance the equities to determine if an injunction should be granted.
- Holding: Property rule protection for neighbors (fairness)
- landowners were entitled to injunction against operation of air-conditioning equipment despite failure of jury to give affirmative answer to proximate cause issues related to damages.
- there is no major public benefit at stake, but the sharp decrease in property values after installation of the air conditioning unit indicates the nuisance level
- better justification: were real harms suffered by Schultzes that were difficult to monetize (public values at stake?)…intangible harms?
- it is not possible for Schultzes to buy out the apartment complex to arrive at “dollars and cents” efficient solution
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?