Woodcock v. Parker case brief summary
30 Fed.Cas. 491 (1813)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiff brought suit against defendant claiming defendant had infringed on plaintiff's patent for a machine, and defendant claimed as its defense that it was using the machine under a derivative title to the machine from the machine's first and original inventor.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Jury verdict for defendant in patent infringement claim.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure: Examples & Explanations, Sixth Edition
Emanuel Law Outline: Criminal Procedure
30 Fed.Cas. 491 (1813)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff brought suit for patent
infringement against defendant for infringing on plaintiff's patent
for a machine.CASE FACTS
Plaintiff brought suit against defendant claiming defendant had infringed on plaintiff's patent for a machine, and defendant claimed as its defense that it was using the machine under a derivative title to the machine from the machine's first and original inventor.
DISCUSSION
- The court instructed the jury that the first inventor to reduce a device to practice and have it patented is not liable to subsequent inventors for infringement.
- The court further instructed that if the plaintiff claims a patent for the entire machine, it must be a new mode, method, or application of the mechanism to produce a new effect or to produce an old effect in a new way.
- The jury returned a verdict for defendant.
CONCLUSION
Jury verdict for defendant in patent infringement claim.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Procedure Criminal Procedure: Examples & Explanations, Sixth Edition
Emanuel Law Outline: Criminal Procedure
No comments:
Post a Comment