United States v. Wolfson case brief summary
405 F.2d 779, cert. denied 394 U.S. 946 (1968)
CASE FACTS
Defendants sold large shares of stock for a corporation in which they were majority shareholders. They did not register the stock as required by statutory law. The government filed suit against them, and defendants contended that they had no idea during the period of the alleged conspiracy that there was any provision of law requiring registration of a security before its distribution by a controlling person to the public. They took the position at trial that they operated at a level of corporate finance far above such "details" as the securities laws and whether a particular stock had to be registered. Defendants asserted that they were much too busy with large affairs to concern themselves with such minor matters and attributed the fault of failure to register to subordinates. The jury found them guilty.
DISCUSSION
On appeal, the court, in affirming the judgment, determined that defendants' sale of shares was a distribution rather than an ordinary brokerage transaction, so that defendants were required to register the securities.
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the district court's judgment.
Suggested Study Aids For Securities Regulation Law
Securities Regulation in a Nutshell, 10th (Nutshell Series)
Securities Regulation: Examples & Explanations, 5th Edition
Securities Regulations: The Essentials
405 F.2d 779, cert. denied 394 U.S. 946 (1968)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Defendants sought review of a judgment
of a United States district court, which found in favor of plaintiff
federal government in the government's action against defendants for
failing to register the sale of securities as required by § 5 of the
Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.S. § 77e.CASE FACTS
Defendants sold large shares of stock for a corporation in which they were majority shareholders. They did not register the stock as required by statutory law. The government filed suit against them, and defendants contended that they had no idea during the period of the alleged conspiracy that there was any provision of law requiring registration of a security before its distribution by a controlling person to the public. They took the position at trial that they operated at a level of corporate finance far above such "details" as the securities laws and whether a particular stock had to be registered. Defendants asserted that they were much too busy with large affairs to concern themselves with such minor matters and attributed the fault of failure to register to subordinates. The jury found them guilty.
DISCUSSION
On appeal, the court, in affirming the judgment, determined that defendants' sale of shares was a distribution rather than an ordinary brokerage transaction, so that defendants were required to register the securities.
CONCLUSION
The court affirmed the district court's judgment.
Suggested Study Aids For Securities Regulation Law
Securities Regulation in a Nutshell, 10th (Nutshell Series)
Securities Regulation: Examples & Explanations, 5th Edition
Securities Regulations: The Essentials
No comments:
Post a Comment