United States v. Ross case brief summary
456 U.S. 798 (1982)
CASE FACTS
A reliable informant contacted police department, describing respondent's vehicle, the location of the vehicle and respondent and stating that he had just seen respondent complete a drug sale. At the scene, a license and computer check revealed that the matching car was registered to a person fitting respondent's description. Five minutes later, police officers observed the vehicle being driven by respondent and stopped the vehicle. The police officers discovered a bullet in the front seat and a pistol in the glove compartment. Upon respondent's arrest, police officers opened the trunk and found a closed paper bag containing a white powder.
ISSUE
At issue was whether the warrantless search of the vehicle stopped by police officers who had probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained contraband was unreasonable under U.S. Constitutional amendment IV.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The court reversed and remanded, holding that if probable cause justified the search of the lawfully stopped vehicle, it justified the search of every part of the vehicle and its contents that may have concealed the object of the search.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
456 U.S. 798 (1982)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner United States sought review
of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit, which held that the warrantless search
of an automobile stopped by police officers who had probable cause to
believe that the vehicle contained contraband was unreasonable within
the meaning of U.S. Constitutional amendment IV.CASE FACTS
A reliable informant contacted police department, describing respondent's vehicle, the location of the vehicle and respondent and stating that he had just seen respondent complete a drug sale. At the scene, a license and computer check revealed that the matching car was registered to a person fitting respondent's description. Five minutes later, police officers observed the vehicle being driven by respondent and stopped the vehicle. The police officers discovered a bullet in the front seat and a pistol in the glove compartment. Upon respondent's arrest, police officers opened the trunk and found a closed paper bag containing a white powder.
ISSUE
At issue was whether the warrantless search of the vehicle stopped by police officers who had probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained contraband was unreasonable under U.S. Constitutional amendment IV.
DISCUSSION
- The scope of a warrantless search of an automobile was defined by the object of the search and the places in which there was probable cause to believe it would be found.
- Probable cause justifying the search of a lawfully stopped vehicle justified the search its contents that could have concealed the object of the search.
CONCLUSION
The court reversed and remanded, holding that if probable cause justified the search of the lawfully stopped vehicle, it justified the search of every part of the vehicle and its contents that may have concealed the object of the search.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
No comments:
Post a Comment