People v. Weiss case brief summary
12 N.E.2d 514 (1938)
CASE FACTS
Appellants seized an individual suspected of committing murder in order to bring him to justice. As a result of this action, appellants were convicted of kidnapping under N.Y. Penal Law § 1250. In an effort to overturn their convictions, appellants argued that the trial court impermissibly ruled against the introduction of evidence, which supported their innocence. Specifically, appellants contended that they acted with the mental state believing they were under the authority of law.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The Court of Appeals set aside the verdict convicting appellants of kidnapping where they were entitled to the production of evidence showing that they seized a suspect with the authority of law. Essentially, they were entitled to proof regarding their good faith intent.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
12 N.E.2d 514 (1938)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellants challenged their kidnapping
convictions from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the
second judicial department (New York), asserting that under N.Y.
Penal Law § 1250, they were entitled to offer evidence of intent in
regards to acting within the authority of the law.CASE FACTS
Appellants seized an individual suspected of committing murder in order to bring him to justice. As a result of this action, appellants were convicted of kidnapping under N.Y. Penal Law § 1250. In an effort to overturn their convictions, appellants argued that the trial court impermissibly ruled against the introduction of evidence, which supported their innocence. Specifically, appellants contended that they acted with the mental state believing they were under the authority of law.
DISCUSSION
- The Court of Appeals agreed, and set aside the verdict requiring a new trial.
- The Court held that if appellants could prove they acted in good faith, such evidence might bar penal liability for kidnapping.
CONCLUSION
The Court of Appeals set aside the verdict convicting appellants of kidnapping where they were entitled to the production of evidence showing that they seized a suspect with the authority of law. Essentially, they were entitled to proof regarding their good faith intent.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
No comments:
Post a Comment