Lochner v. New York case brief summary
198 U.S. 45 (1905)
CASE FACTS
The state supreme court, which found that the employer allowed his employee, a baker, to work more than 60 hours in one week in violation of 1897 N.Y. Laws art. 8, ch. 415, § 110, upheld the labor law as a constitutional exercise of the state's police power.
DISCUSSION
The Court reversed the judgment and remanded to the county court.
198 U.S. 45 (1905)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff in error employer appealed a
judgment from the Court of Appeals of New York. The state supreme
court had found that the employer violated 1897 N.Y. Laws art. 8, ch.
415, § 110, which prohibited employers from allowing employees to
work more than 10 hours in one day.CASE FACTS
The state supreme court, which found that the employer allowed his employee, a baker, to work more than 60 hours in one week in violation of 1897 N.Y. Laws art. 8, ch. 415, § 110, upheld the labor law as a constitutional exercise of the state's police power.
DISCUSSION
- The United States Supreme Court reversed.
- The general right to make a contract in relation to one's business, and the right to purchase or to sell labor, was part of the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
- The statute was not necessary as a health law to safeguard the public health or the health of the individuals who labored as bakers.
- The trade of a baker was not an unhealthy one to such a degree that would authorize the legislature to interfere with the right to labor and the right of free contract on the part of the individual.
- Various regulations already governed the cleanliness of the quarters in which bakeries were to be conducted.
- Restricting the number of hours that a baker could work would not further the purpose of those regulations.
- It was not possible to discover the connection between the number of hours a baker could work and the quality of the bread that he produced.
The Court reversed the judgment and remanded to the county court.
No comments:
Post a Comment