U.S. v. Ince case brief
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
21 F.3d 576
CASE SYNOPSIS: Defendant appealed a
decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia, which convicted him of assault with a dangerous weapon
with intent to do bodily harm.
FACTS: Defendant challenged his conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, contending that it was reversible error to admit his alleged confession in order to impeach the credibility of a government witness. The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial.
FACTS: Defendant challenged his conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, contending that it was reversible error to admit his alleged confession in order to impeach the credibility of a government witness. The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial.
ANALYSIS:
The court considered three factors in
determining whether it was highly probable that the admission of the
confession affected the conviction: (1) the centrality of the issue
affected by the error; (2) the steps taken to mitigate the effects of
the error; and (3) the closeness of the case. The identification of
the defendant was the only controverted evidence in the case and it
was probable that the jury was unable to follow the district court's
instruction on impeachment by prior inconsistent statement or apply
it to the testimony, particularly when the prosecutor in closing
argument asked the jury to accept the confession as true. Because the
tainted evidence was a confession and the first trial ended in a
deadlocked jury, the court concluded that the case was sufficiently
close that the erroneous admission of defendant's alleged confession
was not harmless under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a).
CONCLUSION: The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because it was reversible error to have admitted for impeachment purposes an otherwise inadmissible confession.
CONCLUSION: The court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because it was reversible error to have admitted for impeachment purposes an otherwise inadmissible confession.
---
Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?
No comments:
Post a Comment