Friday, October 12, 2012

B v. Director of Public Prosecutions case brief

B v. Director of Public Prosecutions

Synopsis:
A 15-year-old defendant is tried and convicted for statutory rape/soliciting sexual acts from a child under 14. Defendant appeals conviction on the basis that he thought the child was over 14 when he committed the illegal act.

Facts:

-A 15-year-old boy solicits oral sex from a 13-year-old girl
-The boy claims to not have known that the girl was under 14 when he committed the illegal act.

Issue:
Does a mistake of fact about a victim’s age in a statutory rape case can prevent a conviction for the crime.

Holding:
Yes, mistake of fact can be a defense if it is an honest mistake of fact, meaning the boy really did not know the age of the victim.

Analysis:-Rather than the standard being a reasonable mistake, the standard should be making an honest mistake.

-If the defendant genuinely did not know the victim’s age, he should not be convicted of the crime. -Defendants should be judged on the facts as they believe them to be, and thus this defendant is not liable for the crime.

Conclusion:-The appeal is allowed.

-If defendant really did not know the age of the victim, he will be acquitted.

---

Interested in learning how to get the top grades in your law school classes? Want to learn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested in transferring to a high ranked school?

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads

https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...