Thursday, September 6, 2012

US v. Manske case brief


  1. US v. Manske (7th Cir 1999)
    1. three views of breadth of 608(b) – scope of nonconviction misconduct questioning:
      • broad view: allows questioning on almost any misconduct.
      • narrow view: confines questions to acts that are themselves false or misleading.
      • middle view: reaches conduct “seeking personal advantage by taking from others in violation of their rights.”
    2. cts applying FRE 608(b) have rejected broad view; generally allow questions that satisfy the narrow view by asking directly about deceptive statements or behavior.
      • it’s cases like Manske, where conduct has a wrongful/exploitative aspect but isn’t false or deceptive in itself that courts come out either way.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Small Business Tax Tips: Maximizing Deductions and Credits

Small Business Tax Tips: Maximizing Deductions and Credits https://pixabay.com/photos/money-bills-calculator-to-save-256312/  Managing a sma...