- Palmer v. Hoffman (US 1943)
- Δ railroad tried to introduce a report it made exculpating it from responsibility for an accident
- holding: ordinary business of a RR is running trains, not investigating accidents
- too many credibility problems in the report, given incentives of the RR, so 803(6) doesn’t apply
- problems with this holding – it is in the business of businesses to investigate accidents involving their equipment/etc. – this opinion had blanket effect of saying that all accident reports by companies are inadmissible
- many felt that this was going too far – that this should be a discretionary exception to the 803(6) exception
- response to Palmer – FRE and cases following it don’t exclude all such accident reports; instead, make admission of such reports contingent on trustworthiness factor
- exclusion should turn on fact that this particular report was untrustworthy, not that all accident reports by companies are untrustworthy
The best place for complete law school case briefs and law-related news. Want to advertise or post sponsored content? contact us at mrmetropolitan@gmail.com
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Palmer v. Hoffman case brief
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Evolution of Legal Marketing: From Billboards to Digital Leads
https://www.pexels.com/photo/coworkers-talking-outside-4427818/ Over the last couple of decades, the face of legal marketing has changed a l...
-
Class 1: Elements of Fundamental Value: Present Value, Future Value, Net Present Value: Elements of Fundamental Value (38) One year : ...
-
I can help you land in the top 10% of your law school class. Imagine, how your life would be different if you were in the top 10% o...
-
Case Brief: Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. 489 U.S. 141 (1989) Facts: In this case, Bonito Boats, Inc. (Bonito) and Thunder...
No comments:
Post a Comment